|
Fixing The Foundations Of Physics. Humanity has finally evolved to the point where a collective shift is underway, one seen by many other species that also develop written language and are afforded the luxury to flourish, where starting premises based on fear and speculation finally mature into ones based on logic, math, and science. Each of us is dwarfed by the size of the visible universe. Embracing that knowledge while allowing our fears to fade away opens up the doorways to visualize the almost certain structure of what lies beyond the cosmic horizon we can never see past. Embracing the self-evident and poetic fact that there can never be a first second, that no span of time ever spun that itself was not preceded by an infinite span of time, establishes a stronger foundation to build the houses of cards we call our paradigms of science. That directly leads to a conclusion of infinite space, and when we explore the implications of relativity against eternal time and infinite space, we begin to see that there are no inflating bubble universes, nor was there any period of inflation, because a far better explanation exists for the catalyst that not only created our cosmic microwave background, but the entirety of our infinitesimal patch of visible spacetime as well. Once we accept and embrace the premise of eternal time and infinite space, it becomes clear that our existence establishes proof that there must also be infinite energy and infinite mass because infinite space statistically dictates we can not have mass and energy localized only here and not also everywhere. The chance for infinite space to contain matter and energy localized within and near our cosmic horizon and not all across infinite space is statistically zero, which means the fact that we exist dictates a truly homogenous and isotropic infinite 4D-Minkowski spacetime. Our cosmological principle, which has stood for so long, dictates not just the overall approximate mass energy distribution across relative spacetime but for the entirety of spacetime. A foundation far stronger than the ball of band-aids we call our Lambda-CDM model evolves very elegantly when we remove the assumption of a hot, dense center from our theory and instead focus on what general relativity and special relativity tell us happens after recombination. There is a better reason to explain the homogeneous temperature of the cosmic background. A reason that helps explain so many separate cosmic curiosities and offers ways to fix our best simulations to help us zoom out and see "big bangs" occur. By fixing the foundations of physics, we will see how the Lambda-CDM Big Bang evolves into the more all-encompassing Successive Collision Theory. Some of the working parts of the current model are still valid, like much of the timeline from hot dense plasma to eddies of mass orbiting each other, but the starting premise of a hot dense center, extrapolated by a priest scientist, offers no solid explanation for the catalyst that generates the necessary heat nor the ability to reach the densities of energy needed to produce the mass we see around us. Successive Collision Theory provides a realistic cause for the hot dense swirling plasma that forged our visible patch of spacetime, a simple model we already observe to describe the force behind what we label dark energy, an explainable physical process that creates the nested comoving frames of reference we call our visible universe, possibly the causes behind dark matter, and what is really at the center of black holes. It predicts supervoids and massive, slowly rotating cosmic filaments. It predicts early mature galaxies, early massive black holes, structures like the great ring and great arc, as well as explaining the catalyst that turned mass first into hot dense swirling plasma and then recombining into atoms, leaving behind our cosmic background radiation. Before dismissing these claims as another Dunning-Kruger manic crackpot, I am certain that with a very short investment of your time, no more than a few minutes, you will be able to quickly judge the merits behind my claims and gauge the difference between the average rants of a manic and the above-average rants of a polymath. I believe that for any theory to someday claim the title of the long-sought-after "Theory Of Everything", it should be simple, elegant, and all-encompassing. It must do more than offer up an explanation for quantum gravity. It needs to remove what has blocked our ability to clearly see the other 95% of the universe around us, which until now has remained hidden in darkness. It needs to explain better how general relativity tapers off and quantum mechanics takes over below femtometer scales. It needs to explain the single driving force that drives all other forces, while offering a single basic building block that everything is made from. It should remove all the weirdness and spookiness regarding decoherence and wave-particle duality with an interpretation that explains the superdeterministic reason we have a probabilistic wave function. It should be able to explain the sequence of events that created our visible patch of spacetime with a theory that offers multiple possible avenues for falsifiability. It should be able to explain the basic building blocks of the universe and the basic force that drives all other forces, and be able to explain both how our universe started and how it will end. But to truly claim the title of a "Theory Of Everything," I think it also needs to dip its toes in the metaphysical waters and offer up explanations of what happens after we die and how life first formed on this big wet rock we share. When we peel away assumptions that have invaded our best science, a new paradigm becomes evident, and that happens due to what general relativity has shown us happens to most celestial bodies. On average, almost all celestial bodies are in a perpetual game of follow the leader(s). A structure creates naturally from eddies of spinning plasma and eddies of spinning gas, where more massive siblings become parents to those around them who join them on their journey around something even more massive. Our moon and debris, and gas orbit our big wet rock and join our planet as it orbits our host star. Many other planets also drag their moons around with them as they orbit our sun. Our sun drags all the planets, moons, asteroids, and gas along with it as it orbits the center of our galaxy. Billions of other star systems do the same thing and orbit the black hole at our galaxy's center. Our galaxy is orbited by many dwarf galaxies and other bodies all sharing in its orbit, and this continues in a nested succession, sometimes orbiting more massive siblings, and sometimes orbiting a barycenter shared by multiple massive siblings. Using only the math of the general theory of relativity, Einstein's field equations, we see this nested structure should be what properly programmed computer simulations see evolving at larger and larger scale factors. Our galaxy orbits with others around some barycenter, while the local group and the Virgo supercluster may also orbit some more massive barycenter, and as we creep up one rung at a time, we find nested structures orbiting the great attractor, which itself is sharing a barycenter with the Shapley attractor. All of this structure, according to general relativity, is orbiting something even more massive, and there is zero reason to suspect that inside infinite space that this would not continue far beyond our visible cosmic horizon. Our entire visible universe is most likely in some orbit, may have satellites, and would have some approximate axis of rotation, period of rotation, and within the shared parent frame of reference it is hurling through, some relative trajectory and some relative velocity as well as a thermal signature, average luminosity at different distances away, and likely even magnetic and electric fields alongside its immense gravitational field. Not only does our visible universe have siblings and "cousins," but there is a fairly good reason to believe that the events that created our visible universe would have also created potentially four or five nested successions of comoving frames of reference at the same time. Our universe almost certainly has siblings, first cousins, and even second and third cousins, likely because when two immense nested successions of comoving frames of reference find themselves intersecting the same relative area of spacetime, there could be tens of thousands of first collisions, hundreds of thousands of secondary collisions, millions of tertiary collisions, and hundreds of millions of further collisions. Each succession sees an average amount of kinetic energy released, and the nearly uniform temperature of our cosmic background came not by inflation but was driven by successions of collisions at similar kinetic energies used to dissipate that heat somewhat evenly across a vast area of relative spacetime. We would not have needed 380,000 years of cooling if there were no hot, dense center, and instead may have seen only 380,000 days or weeks of cooling to reach an average temperature of 3000 kelvin, where recombination would take place. Many galaxies received initial momentum from collisions that drove their current rotational direction and rotational speed, while long, dense filaments and supervoids are predictions of what we would see when we begin to grasp the true potential limits of the kinetic energies involved. One important noteworthy item to take into consideration is that our cosmic speed limit, by its definition, is due to some larger inertial reference frame we define as the visible universe and the nested successions that it is contained within. A separate nested succession of separate comoving frames of reference would have its own internal cosmic speed limits as well, but the possible speeds of collisions between these immense separate nested structures have the potential to easily exceed twice the speed of light. When mass collides at relative velocities of 42 or 67 times the speed of light, or maybe just 2.5 or 3.7 times the speed of light, the physics involved, I believe, point towards vast filamentary-like structures of slightly different widths and lengths. When those two massive nested successions of comoving frames of reference intersect paths, they would share some common parent frame of reference. That could be tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of nested levels above our scale factor, but within that shared frame, one of the two collections would normally have a higher relative velocity than the other. So as those collisions occurred, the "faster" relative partner in each collision would determine the average trajectory of the resulting hot dense plasma stream and the length of the stream, while the masses of the objects involved would determine the width of the densest points. The collisions occurring at all different angles of impact and degrees of impact could be simulated well, and over time, our best simulations will begin to model the cosmic web we see around us. Direct head-on collisions at superluminal speeds offer the possibility of more matter being created at our scale factor than the starting matter of the two bodies that collided. When two immense pockets pass through shared spacetime, it's not just collisions of massive bodies that can create hot dense, swirling plasma, but the intersecting spacetime itself is filled with nebulous gas, stray atoms, electrons, photons, lots of neutrinos, and even vacuum energy. The friction of superluminal spacetime overlap could itself also create cosmic structures. Collisions themselves could happen with different degrees of impacts, where initial collisions that glanced off each other could leave behind ultra diffuse galaxies, while others that did more than just glance could see massive galaxies form. With an unknown limit to the speed of those collisions, even just low estimates of 3.6 or 3.7 time the speed of light the conversion of mass to hot dense plasma would be nearly instantaneous yet shards would break out and experience secondary and tertiary and subsequent collisions and all different random densities of mass would distribute "mostly" evenly yet clumpy enough to create distinctive structure. Early mature galaxies, early massive black holes, supervoids, and superfilaments, among so many other observations that have yet to see a viable cohesive explanation, are all easily explained when we remove the hot dense center in favor of successive superluminal collisions. But the science does not stop there. I mentioned we need to use both general and special relativity to fully grasp reality, and what we know about special relativity is that the faster you move through space, the slower you move through time. That means that each comoving frame of reference in that nested succession experiences a shared base perception of both time and space. When we have multiple bodies that are all sharing the same relative trajectory and the same relative velocity as a comoving frame of reference, they would all share in some base perception of the spacetime around them. Then, inside each comoving frame, that base perception of time and space would be further refined by their unique individual velocities within that parent frame as well as the effects of all the separate gravity wells they each pass through. So every body or gravitationally bound group of bodies moving as a whole would obtain a base perception of spacetime from its most direct parent frame of reference and that base perception could be modified by their own relative velocities and gravitational fields acting upon and that modified and refined unique perception of both time and space is then passed on to all their children frames of reference in a nested succession. The nature of time is that it is hereditary and inherited from each successive parent frame of reference that you exist within. Right now, if the entire Laniakea supercluster tripled its velocity, we would experience a non-zero change in our perception of time and space for all those events outside that shared frame. That natural structure to time obtained through each nested succession of gravitationally bound siblings playing follow the leader(s) is where we get dark energy from, not from our quantum vacuum. I think there should be a law of physics that states that every orbit contains within it a finite amount of relative mass, while a nearly infinite amount of relative mass exists outside that orbit. And within no bounded region of space or time can you place an infinite amount of relative mass or an infinite amount of relative energy or an infinite amount of relative space or an infinite amount of relative time. That is why, on average, most orbits increase in diameter over time. Moons move away from planets that slowly move away from their suns that slowly move away from their central black holes, and we see this occurring at even larger and larger scale factors. It could take thousands of years of deep cosmic observation and recording to really begin to see the increasing diameters of orbits in a nested succession. Not every level will see this, as some will see the energy dissipate in such a way that a shared dance will become faster and faster until a collision and merger occurs, but on average, more orbits increase in diameter over time. Because we get our time from this nested succession, then a slow dissipation in mass energy cohesion occurring on average across a nested succession of parent frames of reference would, in fact, look to us at our scale factor like the very fabric of space and time was being torn apart. Dark energy does not stem from the vacuum but from a nested succession of parent comoving frames of reference, each slowly increasing in relative diameters. So many more mysteries, like the mysteries of quantum mechanics and other things that I mentioned a true theory of everything would need to cover, are all covered in my books and podcasts, and so if I touched on some curiosity within you to explore better explanations for the universe around us than current science is yet unwilling to embrace, please check out the hashtags #thenaturalstateofnature and #aleapyearcrossinglightyears.
#thenaturalstateofnature #therealbigbangs #successivecollisiontheory #thebigbang #BIGBANG #theinfiniteuniverse #multiverse
|